The Article I Can't Give Away
I finally found it, spurred on by yet another incident. How many more Officers are going to get in trouble before someone listens to me? I can't get a single media source to reprint this, because the IACP's president, and a few other influential people, can't accept reality, and in fact, advise people not to stop for the police. Some traffic violator will wind up dead, and Police will get some of the most restrictive pursuit laws in the world as a result.
-Shawn
I allow this article to be reprinted without compensation as long as no profit is made from it.
Stopping for Impersonators – Another Viewpoint
Because of the breadth of experience and expertise here, I generally confine myself to a couple of specialties.
However, there’s been some advice offered I feel so strongly about that I decided to write a rebuttal to it.
I often get emails or people chatting me up when I am out wanting opinions on Law Enforcement topics. I try to give them the best data I can, keeping operational security in mind. (Even in the era of the Discovery Channel, and CSI:wherever, I still think there are things the public doesn’t need to know.)
One topic that keeps coming up is advice on traffic stops. Not so much for the Officer, but the violator. There is an email chain letter (probably, truth be told, many letters) that proffers the following advice:
“If you are out in a rural setting or an area that is sparsely populated and you see police lights in your rear view mirror, stick your arm out of the window to let the officer know you are aware of him and then drive carefully to a well lit, populated area.”
Of course, there are a million variants of this, such as: “turn on your flashers to let him know”.
Or, there are those who train women that if “it doesn’t feel right, its’ ok to …” and then they plug in anything but stop immediately.
In fact, googling the topic using the keywords “cop safety tips pull over lighted” returned 537 THOUSAND results.
At the risk of offending some of you, I think this is bad, bad advice. Give me a minute to tell you why.
With the current advice, you are pitting an immovable object against an irresistible force. On one hand, you have a vehicle that needs to be pulled over. Maybe it will stop, maybe not. Maybe it doesn’t stop because it is a co-ed who is a little more paranoid than she needs to be, maybe it’s because it’s Pookie who is holding and has no intention of spending the weekend in county lockup.
On the other hand, you have an Officer. Remembering the sage advice ‘NEVER allow the violator to choose the place for the stop’, in his (or her) head, there is a flow chart. “I activate the emergency lights. Either they stop, or they don’t. If they do, that’s good, and we move on to the next step. If they don’t….. we move to a whole other chart. This one is entitled ‘they are running, so we are now chasing’.” I don’t know about you, but I do *not* want anybody I care about on the receiving end of an amped up Officer who thinks they just ended a felony pursuit.
Add to this mix the increasing restrictions on who and what can make a traffic stop. There are jurisdictions that do not allow anything but a marked car with a uniformed Officer to make stops. This hampers Detectives and Narcotics guys, as well as State and Federal Agents, none of which typically drive marked cars or wear uniforms. In the ‘uniform only’ jurisdictions, this absolutely sets up a pursuit any time one of the non-uniforms needs to stop a violator, because the community knows ‘only Patrol makes stops’. It exposes them and their agencies to extreme liability exposure. What happens if a Detective obeys policy and fails to stop an obvious DUI that subsequently crashes into a crowded restaurant? Or a plainclothes supervisor violates policy and stops a car leaving an obvious robbery, and the lawyer uses that to their advantage in court and the subsequent lawsuit?
The number one thing we should be doing in Public Outreach is telling the same story. Conflicting advice leads to variable results leads to trouble. Consider; if one parent tells a child how to do something, and the other parent tells the kid a different story, whose fault is it when the child doesn’t do what the first parent told them? That’s not to say I advocate a parent – child relationship with your traffic violators, I could have substituted Senior Drill Instructor or Academy Staff for parent and recruit for child and the story still stands – consistency is the key to understanding. That’s why Dept. of Transportation personnel have very strict guidelines for tinkering with traffic – the traveling motorist already has a ton of things to consider. Giving them options to think about at 70MPH is an unnecessary and potentially lethal proposition.
What does one have to do with the other?
When you have publicly accepted police experts, and even Law Enforcement Agencies advocating drivers not to pull over if they think whoever behind them is not a Police Officer, and on the other hand you have departments that will shoot the tires out from under fleeing vehicles, you are setting the public and Officers up for failure.
I won’t bore you by repeating it here, but feel free to read some of our other excellent articles on what happens when you take a trained, agile Police Officer, apply a startling stimuli, and then require them to make a decision between a couple of options. In fact, causing that confusion and hesitation is exactly why we use distraction devices.
So, how do we defuse this situation?
First, lets’ knock the sexist crap out. Telling women to do anything differently than we teach men is wrong. It sends the message from us, authority figures to women that they aren’t as powerful, or as cunning, or as able as men. As my Mom and my girlfriend will be quick to tell you, that’s a load of crap. Sure, you may be protective of your daughter or wife, but if you can’t bring yourself to have the faith they can handle themselves in a situation, neither will they.
It’s also a bit arrogant. The female driver just assumes the man with the flashing light behind them just intends to sex her. What if he (could be a she) is trying to tell her that her dog is still tied to the bumper (it happened where I live recently) or that her baby is in the carrier on the roof of her van? Or she tries to continue on to the service station over the hill, when they are actually trying to warn her that a drunk driver is barreling toward her in the next curve in the wrong lane?
Secondly, any first year jailer will tell you that you don’t give people options. You tell them what you need them to do, specifically. This increases the odds that the people being directed will do what you just asked them to do.
Lastly, it doesn’t matter if the car is a surveillance, unmarked, or marked car.
This is what we need to do regarding giving advice on traffic stops. We need to lock step, and give only one kind of advice; when you see emergency lights, you need to be pulling over. Not four miles later, or when you hit your driveway, now.
How the violator handles the stop after they have pulled over can be handled differently for different circumstances, just as we do.
For instance:
If the person you are giving advice to feels they are in danger, you still tell them to pull over. Turn on the dome light if its’ dark, but *don’t* put it in park. Get off the phone, turn off the radio, and roll the window down just enough to hear; keep their right foot on the brake. In other words, just like stopping at a red light (they do drive with the doors locked, right?)
Nobody is going to be expecting them to have their window still up, and it will be hard to break if it is a Bad Person. (To break a window quickly, you need sharp and pointy, something not historically seen in the hands of rapists and carjackers). The guy doesn't look like a cop, he says ‘open up’, you tell your person to say ‘let me see your photo ID’. They should then slow down, breathe, and LOOK at the person pulling them over. LISTEN to what the Officer is saying.
I can’t clearly recall ever hearing of a rapist or carjacker impersonating an Officer that thought ahead to make an ID card, too. But I know every sworn, certified Police Officer making traffic stops have one somewhere. Even so, this is a delaying tactic. Your friend previously has set their cell phone up to have 911 as a speed dial number. After pulling over and doing the other things I recommended, they should be calling Dispatch to see if who is behind them is on a legit stop. They should tell the Officer, “I am calling 911.”
If this is an Officer on this stop, they should be trained and seasoned well enough to see this is a scared individual and not a gangbanger or person with warrants. They can then scale back, and work from there. There shouldn’t be a pressing need most cases to extract the driver, because they immediately heaved to and are now presenting a reduced threat of flight.
On the other hand, if it is a Bad Person, they will want in, because that is the only way for them to control the situation. If Fake Cop starts screaming at the driver to get out, or he starts whacking at the window, you tell your friend to simply accelerate away and hopefully run over their feet on the way out.
On the very slight chance the Bad Person knocks the window out first hit, you tell your friend to stomp on the gas and drag him down the road. Remember they should be belted in, right? (!)
If the Bad Person points a gun, your friend or family member still just steps on it. Have you, as a trained marksman, ever try shooting at a moving target? It's hard. Versus, stopping at a gas station, where realistically no bystander ever gets involved, and your friend still gets yanked out of the car.
Stopping immediately reduces the adrenaline dump that a legit Officer is going to get from a perceived pursuit. It works in the drivers’ favor, because they have a plan. Few Bad People are prepared for someone who drives away. It gives your loved ones, friends, and the people you offer advice to a fighting chance. If you don’t believe it works, find a parking lot, borrow your kids’ airsoft gun, and then take turns being the Bad Person and the Driver.
This advice works, because it doesn’t limit us to types of vehicles or uniforms, which can all be spoofed. It applies as well to carjackers as it does blue-light bandits. It is straightforward, can be learned simply, and works as well in Anchorage as it does Miami. It does not discriminate, it works equally well for women, men, teenagers and the elderly. It is what we should be recommending. Anything else is a disaster in the making.
-Shawn Hughes


